Ed/Tech must-reads (Full)

ASCILITE 2023 Full papers

a large modern conference hall with many papers falling from the ceiling

As I mentioned last week, I’ve been in Christchurch, NZ catching up with some of my people at the ASCILITE conference. As always, there was a plethora of interesting papers, pecha kuchas and workshops pertaining to technology enhanced learning and teaching. In the full papers, my interest was piqued by this selection. (I will get onto the concise papers another time.) It was particularly encouraging to see such great representation from and about third space practitioners.

This paper outlines a quite detailed professional development program being run at the Keypath OPM in support of new learning designers. It categorises key skills into learning and design, media and technology, project management and leadership and communication.

This one was more of a thought exercise in some ways, looking to take the emerging use of “digital twins” (a digital replica of a physical object or process) and apply it to learners and learning analytics. Ideas raised included how and why this might be used on individual students ethically, what the benefits and feasibility might be and where it could go.

I must admit, this spoke to me because I worked on something similar maybe 15 years ago but the progression of tech since then has certainly changed things somewhat. It provides healthcare students with patients to safely practice communication skills on before being let loose on real ones.

In spite of the fact that Learning Analytics has been on the radar for more than a decade and institutions have made massive investments in research centres, it feels as though the practical execution has been rather limited. This paper provides five rich case studies of differing LA use in Australian universities.

This paper showcases work on providing education students with remote, real-time feedback in teaching placements, including the development of a workable and concise communication system.

Gilmore and Nguyen take a different approach to Abblitt et al. in understanding the PD needs of learning designers by scouring LinkedIn profiles and job ads to develop an alternate set of in demand skills and knowledge.

I’ve long been interested in the iterative development of consensus wisdom that the Delphi process enables and this work-in-progress paper from MacCallum et al. about supporting GenAI literacy highlights some of its promise.

Yes, this was mine - it’s a slightly out of date work in progress update of my own doctoral research into what I’m calling EdAdvisors - third space practitioners such as learning designers, education technologists and academic developers (etc). (I say it’s slightly out of date because I have newer and more interesting findings since I submitted it, which I did present on the day).

Transmedia learning essentially covers the use of a variety of platforms, including the LMS and assorted social media tools, to provide greater opportunities for co-creation and collaboration. Tombleson sees the strengths of this as information learning, participatory culture, transmedia play and skills and connectedness.

This is a valuable process focused study which lays out the steps that learning designers work through as they convert relatively static law school learning materials into more active and dynamic learning experiences.

This also provides these kinds of insights, describing the work undertaken to embed interactivity in self-paced modules in a business school in three separate case studies.