Ed/Tech must-reads 050324

Learner engagement with instructor-generated video from British Journal of Educational Technology

It’s nice to step away (briefly) from GenAI content, and this detailed and thoughtful paper from Truss et al. at the University of Portsmouth takes us to a simpler time. It takes a considered approach to understand students’ engagement with video content in terms of behavioural (how and when), cognitive (understanding) and affective (presence) factors. They found that accessing video fluctuated depending on proximity of assessments, and video was valued for the flexibility and control it gave students. They preferred materials intended to enhance understanding of content rather than that which served as the primary delivery mode and (perceived) relevance was vital. Effective use of the technology was expected, with decent audio and visuals but professional production was not. Students were divided on whether they wanted to see the teacher or not. The authors suggest greater consideration in the creation of video content as well as more institutional support.

Learning to Surf:  Supporting a Campus’s AI Needs from Faculty focus

Leslie Bruce (California State Uni) proposes a staged approach for institutions to enter the GenAI water (and we’re back), starting with (paid) GenAI bootcamps for academics for familiarisation, moving on to design thinking oriented, learner centred, well funded “AI-infused academic programs” and also constantly reviewing work with GenAI in the institution and further afield. If you have the money, sure, I guess.

Intelligence requires understanding & meaning from Heart Soul Machine

Tim Klapdor (Uni Adelaide) has some strong feelings about how ‘intelligent’ artificial intelligence actually is in this rather entertaining cri de coeur. He lands some solid blows on the idea that GenAI ‘creates’ content and on the overall hype. I must admit, it is getting harder to find useful and interest material about its application in education among a galaxy of tedious filler content from influencers and snake oil sellers. He also touches on the difference between behaviour and learning/understanding that separates us from our inevitable silicon overlords.